Open the subject with the following
narrative:
“It was 1666, probably in late summer.
Twenty-three-year-old graduate student Isaac Newton was at his family
farm about 100 miles north of London. He was home because his
university had suspended classes because of the outbreak of plague in
London. The epidemic would continue until a huge fire suddenly burned
down much of the city. The government then went broke, and the king
laid off most of the navy, despite the fact that he was at war with
Holland. The Dutch would then raid the main British naval base, tow
off one battleship as a souvenir, and set fire to the rest. It was,
in other words, a good time to find something diverting to think
about.
For Newton, the diversion was provided by
an apple tree. He saw an apple do something that was, to him, at that
moment, intriguing.”
Hold out the apple and let it fall to the
ground.
Invite the class to describe what just
happened.
There will presumably be a consensus that
the apple fell to the ground.
However, explain to students that, more
specifically, the apple accelerated toward the center of the Earth.
Apparently, the Earth has some power of attraction over the apple.
But the Earth spreads out to the horizon.
“Why did the apple go straight down?”
Newton assumed that the sum of the
attraction was at the center of the Earth, and that the masses on
either side of it canceled each other out. But how far out did this
force extend? For instance, could it reach to the moon? If so, it
probably reached out indefinitely, and was the governing factor in
celestial mechanics.
There was an assumption that celestial
bodies were governed by different powers than those at work on the
surface of the Earth. Anyway, how could the moon be influenced by the
Earth when they were so far apart? Doing so required “influence at
a distance,” which ranked with ghost stories.
But if the sum of the Earth’s attraction
was at the Earth’s center, then here on the Earth’s surface,
about 6,400 kilometers (about 4,000 miles) from its center, we were
already being influenced from a distance. Why would it not extend
farther?
Newton set out to find a convincing
demonstration that the force guiding the orbit of the moon was an
extension of the force that we feel here on Earth.
First, he calculated how much the moon is
being deflected from a straight path through space. His calculations
showed that the moon experienced a deflection toward the Earth—if
that’s what it was—of about 13 feet per minute. We don’t know
exactly how he derived this figure.
He was aware of Kepler’s calculations
concerning the motions of planets, which showed that their orbital
motions reduced speed as they became farther from the sun. In fact,
the results implied that the attraction of the sun fell off according
to the square of the distance. In other words, something that was
twice as far away experienced a quarter of the force, etc.
If the moon was under the control of the
Earth’s attraction, then the attraction that the moon experienced
should follow the same “inverse square” ratio. Now let’s review
Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitational, which utilized the
principles of the Inverse Square Law.
The Gravitational force between Earth and
the moon is attractive and the force exerted on moon by Earth (F1)
is equal in magnitude to the force exerted on the Earth by the moon
(F2). See diagram below.
Gravitational force depends on the
distance between the two masses involved. If the mass of two objects
(m1 and m2) are
separated by a distance (r), the magnitude of the gravitational force
is given by the equation above.
To establish whether this was so, he needed
three pieces of information.
Write these numbers on the board:
- 6,371 kilometers (the distance to the center of the Earth)
-
400,000 kilometers (approximate distance to the moon)
-
9.8 meters/second squared (force of gravity at the Earth’s
surface)
Ask for a volunteer to use a calculator or
to populate a spreadsheet during this demonstration.
Continue the discussion by explaining that
Newton presumably made these three calculations:
-
First, he found the ratio between the
attraction at the surface of the Earth and at the moon’s distance.
If the attraction truly falls off by the square of the distance, the
ratio would be the distance to the moon squared, divided by the
distance from the center of the Earth to the surface, squared. (The
answer should be 3,941.89.)
-
Next he discovered how far something
would fall in a minute on the Earth’s surface. Since the
acceleration of gravity here on the surface is 9.8 meters per second
square, we square 60 and multiply it by 9.8. Then, since we started
accelerating from zero, we divide the total in half. (The answer
should be 17,640 meters. Since this is more than 1,050 kilometers
per hour, or more than 650 miles per hour, caution students that in
the atmosphere an object would reach terminal velocity before
reaching such speeds.)
-
Finally, he divided the one-minute fall
on the surface in Step 2 by the ratio found in Step 1. The result is
4.48 meters, or 14.68 feet.
That’s very close to the 13 feet Newton
had calculated for the moon’s deflection, based on approximate
values. Newton performed the calculations more than once over a
period of years using different values. He became convinced that what
we feel here on the Earth is the same force that the moon is
experiencing.
But what about the rest of the solar system?
If the Earth’s gravity controls the orbit of the moon, it seems
logical to infer that the gravity of the sun controls the orbits of
the planets. But that seemed to be asking a lot as the distances
involved are huge. In fact, at the time they had only a vague idea
what those distances were.
At this point, define the Astronomical Unit
(AU), a unit of measurement that equals the distance between the
Earth and the sun. While Newton and his colleagues did not know how
far away the planets were, they could track precisely how the planets
appeared to change location as the Earth moved around the sun in its
orbit. This let them plot triangles, the base of which was the
distance between the Earth and sun. The other two sides were the
distance from the planet to the Earth, and from the planet to the
sun.
When you know the angles of the corners of a
triangle, and the length of one side, you can use trigonometry to
find the length of the other two sides. In this case they did not
know the length of any of the three sides, but they knew that one
side, stretching between the Earth and the sun, remains about the
same. So they called that side AU, and figured the other sides in
proportion to AU.
During Newton’s lifetime, astronomers
realized that previously accepted values for AU were too low by a
factor of about 20. Considerable work by leading astronomers went
into refining the value of AU, and a value close to the currently
accepted distance was reached by 1659. However, total accuracy and
laser light (and direct measurement) had to wait for the invention of
radar.
But as it turns out, knowing orbital
distances for the planets in AUs, and orbital periods in years, is
enough to show that the sun’s gravity extends into the farthest
reaches of the solar system. Orbital periods for the planets had long
been established. As early as 1605 (before astronomical telescopes
were invented) mathematician Johannes Kepler (1571–1630)
established that the orbital period of a planet had a direct
relationship to its distance from the sun. Not only did orbital
speeds get slower for bodies farther from the sun, but he found a
constant relationship:
- The cube of the planet’s distance from the sun was directly
proportional to the square of the orbital period.
Using D to stand in for the planet’s
distance from the sun, and P to stand in for its orbital period, the
formula for the relationship, now called Kepler’s Third Law of
Planetary Motion, looks like this (write on the board):
Distribute copies of the Kepler worksheet
(S-8-1-3_Kepler Worksheet.doc). Depending on
the availability of equipment, students can work on it individually,
each with a calculator or PC, or gather in groups, each having a
calculator or PC with one person running it. But to drive home the
lesson, each student should complete a worksheet. If there is only
one calculator or PC in the class, have a volunteer use it to perform
the operation and write the result on the board, which students can
copy.
Restate the instructions on the worksheet:
cube D for each body and then take the square root of the resulting
number and enter it into the Calculated Orbital Period column. The
value for Earth is already entered. (It’s trivial: 1 cubed is one,
and the square root of 1 is 1.)
The results, rounded to two decimal places
and shown in italics, should look like this:
Body
|
D (in AUs)
|
Calculated Orbital Period of Earth
(in years)
|
Observed Orbital Period of Earth (in
years)
|
Mercury
|
0.39
|
0.24
|
|
Venus
|
0.73
|
0.62
|
|
Earth
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
|
Mars
|
1.53
|
1.89
|
|
Ceres
|
2.77
|
4.61
|
|
Jupiter
|
5.2
|
11.86
|
|
Saturn
|
9.54
|
29.47
|
|
Uranus
|
19.2
|
84.13
|
|
Neptune
|
30
|
164.32
|
|
Pluto
|
39.5
|
248.25
|
|
Eris
|
67.7
|
557.04
|
|
-
When all calculations are completed, assess
student outcomes After each value is given, ask for feedback on how
close it is to the calculated value.
The observed orbital periods are as follows:
Body
|
Observed Period
(in years)
|
Mercury
|
0.24
|
Venus
|
0.62
|
Earth
|
1.0
|
Mars
|
1.89
|
Ceres
|
4.61
|
Jupiter
|
11.86
|
Saturn
|
29.47
|
Uranus
|
84.13
|
Neptune
|
164.32
|
Pluto
|
248.25
|
Eris
|
557.04
|
-
Continue the lesson by making two points:
- The calculated results were almost indistinguishable from the
observed results.
-
Ceres, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, and Eris were not known to exist in
Kepler’s time, yet his Third Law fits their orbits, too.
We can confidently state that Kepler’s
relationship is the result of underlying physical laws and not a
numerical coincidence. It implies that the influences of the sun
extend into the farthest regions of space. Today it is accepted that
its influence extends into interstellar space until it is canceled
out by the influence of other stars.
Because of gravity, the moon orbits the
Earth, and the Earth and other planets orbit the sun. The sun,
meanwhile, orbits the center of the galaxy.
Extension:
- Students can divide the observed orbital value by the calculated
value for each body on the worksheet. All the values should round to
1, but some calculated values will be a better fit than others.
-
Lead a discussion of why the fit is not perfect. The reasons
include:
-
The planets disturb each other’s orbits with their gravity as they
move.
-
The orbits of the planets are ellipses rather than circles, so
Kepler’s relationship is a simplified model of what is happening
in the solar system.